Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Digitalizing English-language CT Interpretation for Positive Haemorrhage Evaluation Reporting: the DECIPHER study
0
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Identifying whether there is a traumatic intracranial bleed (ICB+) on head CT is critical for clinical care and research. Free text CT reports are unstructured and therefore must undergo time-consuming manual review. Existing artificial intelligence classification schemes are not optimised for the emergency department endpoint of classification of ICB+ or ICB-. We sought to assess three methods for classifying CT reports: a text classification (TC) programme, a commercial natural language processing programme (Clinithink) and a generative pretrained transformer large language model (Digitalizing English-language CT Interpretation for Positive Haemorrhage Evaluation Reporting (DECIPHER)-LLM). METHODS: Primary objective: determine the diagnostic classification performance of the dichotomous categorisation of each of the three approaches. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: determine whether the LLM could achieve a substantial reduction in CT report review workload while maintaining 100% sensitivity.Anonymised radiology reports of head CT scans performed for trauma were manually labelled as ICB+/-. Training and validation sets were randomly created to train the TC and natural language processing models. Prompts were written to train the LLM. RESULTS: 898 reports were manually labelled. Sensitivity and specificity (95% CI)) of TC, Clinithink and DECIPHER-LLM (with probability of ICB set at 10%) were respectively 87.9% (76.7% to 95.0%) and 98.2% (96.3% to 99.3%), 75.9% (62.8% to 86.1%) and 96.2% (93.8% to 97.8%) and 100% (93.8% to 100%) and 97.4% (95.3% to 98.8%).With DECIPHER-LLM probability of ICB+ threshold of 10% set to identify CT reports requiring manual evaluation, CT reports requiring manual classification reduced by an estimated 385/449 cases (85.7% (95% CI 82.1% to 88.9%)) while maintaining 100% sensitivity. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: DECIPHER-LLM outperformed other tested free-text classification methods.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
2009 · 11.174 Zit.
Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
2011 · 9.373 Zit.
Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
2011 · 8.880 Zit.
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
2021 · 7.441 Zit.
Thrombolysis with Alteplase 3 to 4.5 Hours after Acute Ischemic Stroke
2008 · 6.614 Zit.