Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Auditing What Was Said: The Epistemic Promise and Limits of Ambient AI in Clinical Practice
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Traditional audit methods that rely on written records often miss the nuances of clinical reasoning that influence patient care. Ambient artificial intelligence captures spoken clinical encounters, allowing the analysis of real clinician–patient dialogue at scale. In a study of 124 urology consultations, a transcript-centered audit identified inter-physician variation and expert disagreement that conventional review missed. We explore the epistemic gains of this approach, its nonverbal blind spots, behavioral effects, technical vulnerabilities, and the EU AI Act’s regulatory landscape.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.764 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.674 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.234 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.898 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.