Richard D Riley

TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods

2024 · 1.417 Zit. · BMJ

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence

2021 · 734 Zit. · BMJ Open

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review

2021 · 332 Zit. · BMJ

PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods

2025 · 171 Zit. · BMJ

Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Diagnostic and Prognostic Modeling Studies: Guidance on Their Use

2015 · 124 Zit. · PLoS Medicine

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review

2022 · 124 Zit. · BMC Medical Research Methodology

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review

2022 · 119 Zit. · BMC Medical Research Methodology

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved

2021 · 105 Zit. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society

2021 · 99 Zit. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models

2022 · 89 Zit. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques

2020 · 84 Zit. · BMJ Open

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology

2022 · 61 Zit. · Diagnostic and Prognostic Research

How individual participant data meta-analyses have influenced trial design, conduct, and analysis

2015 · 57 Zit. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Systematic review finds “spin” practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models

2023 · 56 Zit. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review

2023 · 36 Zit. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology