Arturo Casadevall

Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

2012 · 1.204 Zit. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?

2013 · 409 Zit. · PLoS ONE

Retracted Science and the Retraction Index

2011 · 402 Zit. · Infection and Immunity

Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications

2014 · 182 Zit. · eLife

Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct

2013 · 96 Zit. · mBio

Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications

2018 · 60 Zit. · Science and Engineering Ethics

Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: the <i>Molecular and Cellular Biology</i> Experience

2018 · 52 Zit. · Molecular and Cellular Biology

Figure errors, sloppy science, and fraud: keeping eyes on your data

2019 · 20 Zit. · Journal of Clinical Investigation

Why do scientists fabricate and falsify data? A matched-control analysis of papers containing problematic image duplications

2017 · 13 Zit. · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Factors related to the severity of research misconduct administrative actions: An analysis of office of research integrity case summaries from 1993 to 2023

2023 · 6 Zit. · Accountability in Research

Microbial Science Research in the Post-COVID Environment

2021 · 3 Zit. · mBio

Author response: Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications

2014 · 1 Zit.

Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: The <i>Molecular and Cellular Biology</i> Experience

2018 · 0 Zit. · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Reply to “Likelihood of False-Positive Results in High-Impact Journals Publishing Groundbreaking Research”

2012 · 0 Zit. · Infection and Immunity