Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center
Relevante Arbeiten
Meistzitierte Publikationen im Bereich Gesundheit & MedTech
Artificial intelligence to diagnosis distal radius fracture using biplane plain X-rays
Kunihiro Oka, Ryoya Shiode, Yuichi Yoshii et al.
2021 · 44 Zit.
Comparing letters written by humans and <scp>ChatGPT</scp>: A preliminary study
Shigeki Matsubara
2024 · 24 Zit.
Letters generated by ChatGPT: Author who?
Shigeki Matsubara
2024 · 22 Zit.
What's the difference between human‐written manuscripts versus ChatGPT‐generated manuscripts involving “human touch”?
Shigeki Matsubara, Daisuke Matsubara
2025 · 17 Zit.
Humans‐written versus ChatGPT‐generated case reports
Shigeki Matsubara
2024 · 11 Zit.
Pseudo-editorial: replicating abstracts and enlisting ChatGPT to craft an editorial
Shigeki Matsubara
2024 · 11 Zit.
Letter to the Editor: It takes one to know one—Machine learning for identifying <scp>OBGYN</scp> abstracts written by <scp>ChatGPT</scp>
Shigeki Matsubara
2024 · 9 Zit.
Will the day come when opinion and letter pieces disappear from the medical journals?
Shigeki Matsubara
2025 · 7 Zit.
Preserving the human voice: A plea for regulating <scp>ChatGPT</scp> use in Correspondence and Opinion writing
Shigeki Matsubara
2024 · 5 Zit.
<scp>ChatGPT</scp> use in paper writing: A virtue for “English non‐natives”?
Shigeki Matsubara
2024 · 4 Zit.
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Writing: Addressing Untouched Threats
Shigeki Matsubara
2025 · 3 Zit.
Large language model content detectors: Effects of human editing and ChatGPT mimicking individual style—A preliminary study
Shigeki Matsubara
2025 · 3 Zit.
Humans-written versus ChatGPT-generated abstracts: beyond the discussion on “who wrote it”
Shigeki Matsubara
2025 · 2 Zit.
Beyond the Monotonous Discussion of ChatGPT Use in Academic Writing: Expectations for Sleep Science Researchers
Shigeki Matsubara
2025 · 2 Zit.
Reconsidering generative <scp>AI</scp> a friend or foe: Introducing the perspective of “who is merited”
Shigeki Matsubara
2025 · 2 Zit.