OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 27.04.2026, 06:45

Oxford BioMedica (United Kingdom)

7.022 Arbeiten1.031.156 Zitationen
Land: GBTyp: company

Relevante Arbeiten

Meistzitierte Publikationen im Bereich Gesundheit & MedTech

Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies

Myura Nagendran, Yang Chen, Christopher A. Lovejoy et al.

2020 · 1.020 Zit.

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence

Gary S. Collins, Paula Dhiman, Constanza L. Andaur Navarro et al.

2021 · 766 Zit.

Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer

Dmitrii Bychkov, Nina Linder, Riku Turkki et al.

2018 · 645 Zit.

Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI

Baptiste Vasey, Myura Nagendran, Bruce Campbell et al.

2022 · 454 Zit.

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review

Constanza L. Andaur Navarro, Johanna AAG Damen, Toshihiko Takada et al.

2021 · 345 Zit.

Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI

Baptiste Vasey, Myura Nagendran, Bruce Campbell et al.

2022 · 335 Zit.

A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI

Viknesh Sounderajah, Hutan Ashrafian, Sherri Rose et al.

2021 · 224 Zit.

Explainable artificial intelligence for mental health through transparency and interpretability for understandability

Dan W. Joyce, Andrey Kormilitzin, Katharine Smith et al.

2023 · 202 Zit.

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review

Paula Dhiman, Jie Ma, Constanza L. Andaur Navarro et al.

2022 · 132 Zit.

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review

Constanza L. Andaur Navarro, Johanna AAG Damen, Toshihiko Takada et al.

2022 · 123 Zit.

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved

Paula Dhiman, Jie Ma, Constanza L. Andaur Navarro et al.

2021 · 108 Zit.

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models

Constanza L. Andaur Navarro, Johanna AAG Damen, Maarten van Smeden et al.

2022 · 97 Zit.

The Impact of Electronic Decision Support on Transfusion Practice: A Systematic Review

Stephen P. Hibbs, Nathan D. Nielsen, Susan J Brunskill et al.

2014 · 86 Zit.

Establishing key research questions for the implementation of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a modified Delphi method

Omer F. Ahmad, Yuichi Mori, Masashi Misawa et al.

2020 · 67 Zit.

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology

Paula Dhiman, Jie Ma, Constanza L. Andaur Navarro et al.

2022 · 63 Zit.