Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Abstract W MP7: Predictors and Implications of Capacity to Provide Informed Consent for Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment Trials
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2014
Jahr
Abstract
Background and objectives: Enrollment into AIS trials has always been limited by the ability of the patient to give informed consent or the availability of a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) in decision making capacity on behalf of the patient. In this analysis we try to identify the factors contributing to an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patient’s inability to give informed consent. We hypothesized that clinical features and demographics would differ between those patients with and without capacity to consent. Methods: This analysis includes patients who enrolled into the coordinating center of the prospective, randomized ARTSS-2 clinical trial (Argatroban + TPA for acute ischemic stroke) and also screen failures due to inability to consent. Data is collected prospectively in the study screening log. The data collected included age, gender, race, NIHSS, lesion location, ER arrival time and mode of consent (self-consent, LAR-consent and unable to consent). Results: Between 12/11 and 06/13, a total of 33 acute ischemic stroke patients received IV-tPA and were eligible for the ARTSS-2 study. While 19 were enrolled, 14/33 (42.4%) were otherwise eligible, but not enrolled due to inability to self-consent and no LAR present. Patients not enrolled due to lack of capacity to consent and without LAR present tended to have higher median NIHSS scores and greater proportions of drowsiness and aphasia compared to the other groups (see table). Conclusion: Approximately 2 in 5 AIS patients are not eligible for AIS clinical trials based solely on their lack of capacity for informed consent. It is remains ethically imperative that current clinical trials as well as future study designs address this disregarded group of patients who deserve the right to be able to participate in research. Addressing this group of patients through exception from informed consent (EFIC) will both extend research to all stroke patients, but also greatly enhance AIS research.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.822 Zit.
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
2005 · 9.001 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 6.980 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.326 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.650 Zit.