Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures
8.950
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2003
Jahr
Abstract
For structural equation models, a huge variety of fit indices has been developed. These indices, however, can point to conflicting conclusions about the extent to which a model actually matches the observed data. The present article provides some guidelines that should help applied researchers to evaluate the adequacy of a given structural equation model. First, as goodness-of-fit measures depend on the method used for parameter estimation, maximum likelihood (ML) and weighted least squares (WLS) methods are introduced in the context of structural equation modeling. Then, the most common goodness-of-fit indices are discussed and some recommendations for practitioners given. Finally, we generated an artificial data set according to a "true" model and analyzed two misspecified and two correctly specified models as examples of poor model fit, adequate fit, and good fit.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives
1999 · 102.203 Zit.
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
2003 · 73.136 Zit.
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
1981 · 64.467 Zit.
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
1981 · 60.116 Zit.
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
1951 · 42.543 Zit.