Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment
6.616
Zitationen
31
Autoren
2013
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract Black carbon aerosol plays a unique and important role in Earth's climate system. Black carbon is a type of carbonaceous material with a unique combination of physical properties. This assessment provides an evaluation of black‐carbon climate forcing that is comprehensive in its inclusion of all known and relevant processes and that is quantitative in providing best estimates and uncertainties of the main forcing terms: direct solar absorption; influence on liquid, mixed phase, and ice clouds; and deposition on snow and ice. These effects are calculated with climate models, but when possible, they are evaluated with both microphysical measurements and field observations. Predominant sources are combustion related, namely, fossil fuels for transportation, solid fuels for industrial and residential uses, and open burning of biomass. Total global emissions of black carbon using bottom‐up inventory methods are 7500 Gg yr −1 in the year 2000 with an uncertainty range of 2000 to 29000. However, global atmospheric absorption attributable to black carbon is too low in many models and should be increased by a factor of almost 3. After this scaling, the best estimate for the industrial‐era (1750 to 2005) direct radiative forcing of atmospheric black carbon is +0.71 W m −2 with 90% uncertainty bounds of (+0.08, +1.27) W m −2 . Total direct forcing by all black carbon sources, without subtracting the preindustrial background, is estimated as +0.88 (+0.17, +1.48) W m −2 . Direct radiative forcing alone does not capture important rapid adjustment mechanisms. A framework is described and used for quantifying climate forcings, including rapid adjustments. The best estimate of industrial‐era climate forcing of black carbon through all forcing mechanisms, including clouds and cryosphere forcing, is +1.1 W m −2 with 90% uncertainty bounds of +0.17 to +2.1 W m −2 . Thus, there is a very high probability that black carbon emissions, independent of co‐emitted species, have a positive forcing and warm the climate. We estimate that black carbon, with a total climate forcing of +1.1 W m −2 , is the second most important human emission in terms of its climate forcing in the present‐day atmosphere; only carbon dioxide is estimated to have a greater forcing. Sources that emit black carbon also emit other short‐lived species that may either cool or warm climate. Climate forcings from co‐emitted species are estimated and used in the framework described herein. When the principal effects of short‐lived co‐emissions, including cooling agents such as sulfur dioxide, are included in net forcing, energy‐related sources (fossil fuel and biofuel) have an industrial‐era climate forcing of +0.22 (−0.50 to +1.08) W m −2 during the first year after emission. For a few of these sources, such as diesel engines and possibly residential biofuels, warming is strong enough that eliminating all short‐lived emissions from these sources would reduce net climate forcing (i.e., produce cooling). When open burning emissions, which emit high levels of organic matter, are included in the total, the best estimate of net industrial‐era climate forcing by all short‐lived species from black‐carbon‐rich sources becomes slightly negative (−0.06 W m −2 with 90% uncertainty bounds of −1.45 to +1.29 W m −2 ). The uncertainties in net climate forcing from black‐carbon‐rich sources are substantial, largely due to lack of knowledge about cloud interactions with both black carbon and co‐emitted organic carbon. In prioritizing potential black‐carbon mitigation actions, non‐science factors, such as technical feasibility, costs, policy design, and implementation feasibility play important roles. The major sources of black carbon are presently in different stages with regard to the feasibility for near‐term mitigation. This assessment, by evaluating the large number and complexity of the associated physical and radiative processes in black‐carbon climate forcing, sets a baseline from which to improve future climate forcing estimates.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
<i>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change</i>
1998 · 8.989 Zit.
Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated‐k model for the longwave
1997 · 8.602 Zit.
Occurrence of the potent mutagens 2- nitrobenzanthrone and 3-nitrobenzanthrone in fine airborne particles
2019 · 8.522 Zit.
The representative concentration pathways: an overview
2011 · 7.870 Zit.
NOAA’s HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System
2015 · 6.654 Zit.
Autoren
- Tami C. Bond
- Sarah J. Doherty
- D. W. Fahey
- Piers Forster
- Terje K. Berntsen
- B. J. DeAngelo
- M. Flanner
- S. J. Ghan
- B. Kärcher
- D. Koch
- S. Kinne
- Y. Kondo
- Patricia K. Quinn
- Marcus C. Sarofim
- Martin G. Schultz
- Michael Schulz
- Chandra Venkataraman
- H. Zhang
- Xiaofeng Zhang
- Nicolas Bellouin
- Sarath Guttikunda
- Philip K. Hopke
- Mark Z. Jacobson
- Johannes W. Kaiser
- Zbigniew Klimont
- Ulrike Lohmann
- J. P. Schwarz
- Drew Shindell
- Trude Storelvmo
- Stephen G. Warren
- Charles S. Zender
Institutionen
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign(US)
- University of Washington(US)
- NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory(US)
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences(US)
- University of Colorado Boulder(US)
- University of Leeds(GB)
- University of Oslo(NO)
- CICERO Center for International Climate Research(NO)
- Environmental Protection Agency(US)
- University of Michigan–Ann Arbor(US)
- Michigan United(US)
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory(US)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR)(DE)
- United States Department of Energy(US)
- The University of Tokyo(JP)
- NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory(US)
- Forschungszentrum Jülich(DE)
- Norwegian Meteorological Institute(NO)
- Indian Institute of Technology Bombay(IN)
- China Meteorological Administration(CN)
- Peking University(CN)
- Met Office(GB)
- Desert Research Institute(US)
- Clarkson University(US)
- Stanford University(US)
- King's College London(GB)
- Max Planck Institute for Chemistry(DE)
- European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts(GB)
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis(AT)
- Board of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology(CH)
- ETH Zurich(CH)
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies(US)
- Yale University(US)
- University of California, Irvine(US)