Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Influence of Clinical and Economical Factors on the Expert Rating of Appropriateness of Preoperative Use of Recombinant Erythropoietin in Elective Orthopedic Surgery Patients
5
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2004
Jahr
Abstract
To evaluate the relative impact of clinical factors and health care environment resources on the expert ratings of appropriateness of preoperative erythropoietin in elective orthopedic surgery, the authors analyzed 6905 individual votes on 496 clinical scenarios from 14 experts, applying a multivariate logistic model. Sixty-six percent of the indications were appropriate when resource constraints (RC) were not considered and 53% when they were, resulting in a drop in the median vote of 2 points on a 9-point scale (P < 0.05). Initial hemoglobin level, expected perioperative blood loss, and RC were by far the most significant contributors to the model (P < 0.01), but other factors (i.e., clinical specialty of the expert, prior history of transfusion reactions, patient age, cardiovascular disease, anemia of chronic disease) also contributed significantly (P< 0.01). For assessing appropriateness of care, this study confirms the need for detailed clinical scenarios and a multidisciplinary panel carefully selected to reflect those involved in the interventions under consideration.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 85.343 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.806 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.965 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.811 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.529 Zit.