Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Lightscanning versus mammography for the detection of breast cancer in screening and clinical practice. A Swedish multicenter study
61
Zitationen
21
Autoren
1990
Jahr
Abstract
State of the art lightscanning of the breast was tested against mammography in 2568 women in a Swedish multicenter study. The study was in two parts. One was in women with symptoms from the breasts (the clinical study) comprising 3178 examined breasts with 198 cancers; the other in asymptomatic women (the screening study) comprising 1909 examined breasts with 126 cancers. In women with symptoms from the breasts, lightscanning did not contribute to clinical examination and mammography. In the screening situation, it was poor to pick up small cancers. Mammography alone falsely diagnosed cancer in 6.9% of the patients whereas lightscan falsely diagnosed cancer in 19.1%. Lightscan was not better than mammography in young women. The study shows that lightscanning in its current form is inferior to standard mammography.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.953 Zit.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
2011 · 13.776 Zit.
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.497 Zit.
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
2019 · 12.092 Zit.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
2017 · 8.409 Zit.