Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning
2.723
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2005
Jahr
Abstract
This paper is based on the premises that the purpose of engineering education is to graduate engineers who can design, and that design thinking is complex. The paper begins by briefly reviewing the history and role of design in the engineering curriculum. Several dimensions of design thinking are then detailed, explaining why design is hard to learn and harder still to teach, and outlining the research available on how well design thinking skills are learned. The currently most-favored pedagogical model for teaching design, project-based learning (PBL), is explored next, along with available assessment data on its success. Two contexts for PBL are emphasized: first-year cornerstone courses and globally dispersed PBL courses. Finally, the paper lists some of the open research questions that must be answered to identify the best pedagogical practices of improving design learning, after which it closes by making recommendations for research aimed at enhancing design learning.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Reading images: the grammar of visual design
1996 · 8.771 Zit.
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences.
1969 · 5.241 Zit.
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
1963 · 4.120 Zit.
Multidimensional Scaling
1978 · 3.739 Zit.
Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty
1972 · 3.632 Zit.