Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Remote Source Document Verification in Two National Clinical Trials Networks: A Pilot Study
33
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2013
Jahr
Abstract
Because each site had different policies, requirements, and technologies, a common approach to assimilating monitors into the access management system could not be implemented. Despite substantial technology differences, more than 99% of data values were successfully monitored remotely. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of remote monitoring and the need to develop consistent access policies for remote study monitoring.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.822 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 7.002 Zit.
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
1995 · 5.585 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.407 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.772 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University of Colorado Denver(US)
- Colorado School of Public Health(US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus(US)
- Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute
- Massachusetts General Hospital(US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center(US)
- University of Michigan–Ann Arbor(US)
- Michigan United(US)