Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Eyewitness Identification: Victims versus Bystanders
28
Zitationen
1
Autoren
1984
Jahr
Abstract
The present study compared the eyewitness performance of crime victims and bystanders. Fifteen pairs of subjects participated in what they thought to be a risk‐taking experiment that involved betting on the outcomes of a competitive game. In each session, the contest was interrupted when a confederate entered the room and stole the game money from one of the subjects while the other subject, seated across the table, watched. Whereas eight bystanders subsequently recognized the thief from a seven‐picture photospread, not a single victim made an accurate identification (p < .001). On physical descriptions of the confederate, a witness sex × role interaction (p < .05) revealed that this victim‐bystander effect held for female but not male subjects. Both arousal‐based and attentional explanations of these data are considered. The findings are also discussed for their obvious practical implications for eyewitness testimony evidence.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
1972 · 9.502 Zit.
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
2000 · 7.142 Zit.
Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory.
1977 · 7.117 Zit.
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
1968 · 6.968 Zit.
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
2001 · 6.745 Zit.