Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The Discredible Eyewitness
30
Zitationen
2
Autoren
1982
Jahr
Abstract
In a recent, widely publicized finding (Loftus, 1974), eyewitness testimony heightened judgments of guilt even when the testimony was discredited In Study I we offered two hypotheses to explain this finding: that it depends on the order of presentation of evidence, and/or that the discreditors had low credibility due to their self-interest. Contrary to prediction, we found that eyewitness testimony did not heighten judgments of guilt when it was discredited. In Study 2, we replicated our results, again reversing Loftus' original findings, even when the eyewitness was allowed to reaffirm his identification after the discreditation.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
1972 · 9.507 Zit.
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
2000 · 7.147 Zit.
Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory.
1977 · 7.118 Zit.
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
1968 · 6.971 Zit.
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
2001 · 6.752 Zit.