Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Interpretation of Artificial and In Vivo Periapical Bone Lesions Comparing Conventional Viewing Versus a Video Conferencing System
27
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2000
Jahr
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the interpretation of conventional radiographs transmitted by a video teleconferencing system to conventional viewbox interpretation for both artificial and in vivo periapical bone lesions. A total of 30 radiographic images were used in this study: 20 radiographic images of artificial lesions and 10 radiographs from actual patients. Two endodontists evaluated the 30 images by giving a "yes" or "no" response when determining whether a periapical lesion was present on the radiograph. The study was conducted in two sessions, separated by a 6-wk interval to minimize evaluator recall. Results of the study revealed no statistical difference between the ability of the evaluator to identify periapical bone lesions using conventional radiographs on a viewbox and his ability to interpret the same images transmitted on a monitor screen.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale.
1991 · 3.967 Zit.
Radiobiology for the Radiologist.
1974 · 3.502 Zit.
ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee
2017 · 2.422 Zit.
Accuracy of Physician Self-assessment Compared With Observed Measures of Competence
2006 · 2.324 Zit.
Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments
1986 · 2.247 Zit.