Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Plagiarism in Scientific Publications
38
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2009
Jahr
Abstract
misconduct as the ―fabrication, falsification or plagiarism in proposing, performing or reviewing research or in reporting research results ‖ [1]. Plagiarism has itself been defined in many ways, but a common theme is ―the deliberate or reckless use of someone else’s thoughts, words or ideas as one’s own, without clear attribution of their source ‖ [1-3]. In scientific writing, plagiarism is regarded as a serious breach of ethics. Authors have a responsibility to ensure that they make due acknowledgement every time they use the ideas or words of others. Editors of scientific journals also have a responsibility to discourage plagiarism, as well as other forms of misconduct, and to be aware of the effects that such misconduct may have on the
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.517 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.317 Zit.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
2009 · 1.926 Zit.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
2023 · 1.873 Zit.