Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Estimating rate of growth in bone lesions: observer performance and error.
99
Zitationen
6
Autoren
1980
Jahr
Abstract
In an experimental study of reader experience in identifying the variables essential to grading bone neoplasms, reader error is measured against book grade, a human consensus of the presence or absence of key variables. The average accuracy for classifying focal lesions into slow or fast categories is 83.4% for 890 readings as compared with average diagnostic accuracy of 53.7%. Analyses of human error have provided insight into how to improve the grading algorithm without significant loss of its ability to separate lesions into meaningful categories.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic
2003 · 3.023 Zit.
WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone
2013 · 2.873 Zit.
World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone
2002 · 2.810 Zit.
A System for the Surgical Staging of Musculoskeletal Sarcoma
1980 · 2.481 Zit.
A System for the Functional Evaluation of Reconstructive Procedures After Surgical Treatment of Tumors of the Musculoskeletal System
1993 · 2.198 Zit.