Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed?
73
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2000
Jahr
Abstract
Eyewitness researchers have "postdicted" identification accuracy using witness confidence (S. L. Sporer, S. Penrod, D. Read, & B. Cutler, 1995), response latency (S. L. Sporer, 1993, 1994), and endorsement of statements consistent with using relative versus absolute judgment strategies (D. Dunning & L. B. Stern, 1994; R. C. L. Lindsay & K. Bellinger, 1999). All of these measures were collected from 321 introductory psychology students who had viewed a staged crime and completed a lineup identification task. Some participants received feedback after identification (G. L. Wells & A. L. Bradfield, 1998). Lineup fairness was also used as a postdictor of eyewitness accuracy. Discriminant function analysis indicated that 75.2% of choosers and 63.0% of nonchoosers were correctly classified. Decision time and lineup fairness were the best postdictors of accuracy. The implications for postdicting real eyewitness decisions are discussed.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
1972 · 9.502 Zit.
The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?
2000 · 7.142 Zit.
Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory.
1977 · 7.117 Zit.
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
1968 · 6.968 Zit.
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
2001 · 6.745 Zit.