Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
<b>Stereotactic Histologic Biopsy with Patients Prone:</b> Technical Feasibility in 98% of Mammographically Detected Lesions
60
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2003
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine which mammographically detected lesions in need of imaging-guided biopsy could undergo prone, stereotactic biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1991 through June 2001, 1687 consecutive patients (age range, 29-94 years; median age, 58 years) with 1894 lesions were referred by clinicians in a multispecialty clinic. The patients underwent stereotactic, prone, histologic biopsy of 1851 lesions (98%) and needle-localized breast biopsy of 43 lesions (2%). We performed stereotactic biopsies successively with 14-gauge automated large-core devices and 14- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted devices. We evaluated lesions by patient, breast, lesion, and procedural variables to determine why stereotactic biopsy was not performed. RESULTS: Of 1851 lesions referred for stereotactic biopsy, biopsies were canceled in 42 lesions (2%) not considered suspicious enough to warrant biopsy. Of 1809 lesions in which stereotactic biopsy was considered to be warranted, stereotactic biopsy was canceled for technical reasons in 29 lesions (2%). Of 43 lesions referred for surgical biopsy, stereotactic biopsy was thought to be technically problematic in five (12%). Inability to accomplish a stereotactic biopsy in 34 (2%) of 1852 lesions needing a biopsy was due to proximity to the chest wall (n = 10, 29%), inadequate lesion visualization unrelated to lesion depth (n = 19, 56%), and patient factors (n = 5, 15%). CONCLUSION: Stereotactic biopsy had a technical success rate of 98% (1780/1809) and was used for histologic diagnosis in 96% (1780/1852) of mammographically detected lesions. Inadequate lesion visualization accounted for 85% (29/34) of stereotactic biopsy failures.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.918 Zit.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
2011 · 13.769 Zit.
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.468 Zit.
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
2019 · 12.061 Zit.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
2017 · 8.396 Zit.