Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial
2004·266 Zitationen·BMJOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen266
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2004
Jahr
Abstract
Short training packages have only a slight impact on the quality of peer review. The value of longer interventions needs to be assessed.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 89.032 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 83.012 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.711 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.350 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 62.017 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
Themen
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsRadiology practices and educationHealth Sciences Research and Education