Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Risk management tips for video technology
4
Zitationen
1
Autoren
1995
Jahr
Abstract
Proper management of the videotaping of medical procedures begins with identifying the purpose of the video; determining whether it is educational, diagnostic-related, or for "public relations" purposes; and obtaining a clearly defined consent that addresses an understanding of all risks and expectations involved. Although an exception to the policy may become necessary in some instances, addressing the key issues in policies and procedures before taping is the key to minimizing risks. Videotapes are useful as a teaching tool, but they also can easily become a part of the discovery process in a malpractice suit. Given the current nature of discovery in most states, many courts would require disclosure of the videotape. Although this may be disturbing to many health care providers, it should also be considered that the videotape could contain a valid record that the procedure was performed correctly, clearing the physician or facility involved of charges of negligence. With video cameras in such common use today, a positive, proactive position on the benefits involved in videotaping should be taken to minimize the potential negative ramifications that could occur.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 87.332 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.929 Zit.
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
2018 · 37.891 Zit.
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2019 · 28.884 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
2015 · 26.068 Zit.