Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Duplicate publications: A sample of redundancy in the Journal of Urology
21
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2012
Jahr
Abstract
: Detection of redundant publications is a laborious process for reviewers and editors. This sampling of the Journal of Urology revealed that the duplication rate in this journal is small, but significant. Further assessment of the urological literature is warranted.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 85.000 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 82.791 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 76.889 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 62.764 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 61.481 Zit.