Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparative effectiveness research and big data: balancing potential with legal and ethical considerations
31
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2015
Jahr
Abstract
Big data holds big potential for comparative effectiveness research. The ability to quickly synthesize and use vast amounts of health data to compare medical interventions across settings of care, patient populations, payers and time will greatly inform efforts to improve quality, reduce costs and deliver more patient-centered care. However, the use of big data raises significant legal and ethical issues that may present barriers or limitations to the full potential of big data. This paper addresses the scope of some of these legal and ethical issues and how they may be managed effectively to fully realize the potential of big data.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
1986 · 39.069 Zit.
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
2018 · 39.036 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 37.764 Zit.
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2011 · 33.919 Zit.
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
2019 · 29.680 Zit.