Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Failure to Recognize Loss of Incoming Data in an Anesthesia Record-Keeping System May Have Increased Medical Liability
69
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2006
Jahr
Abstract
In Brief Automated anesthesia record-keeping systems (AARKs) are increasingly being used. There is a perception that AARKs may limit medical liability. We report a case in which our AARK may have increased our medical liability exposure. Nine months after a patient suffered a serious intraoperative complication, the anesthesiologist was named (as one of several defendants) in a claim alleging failure to properly monitor anesthetic care. One reason why the anesthesiologist was named related to a gap of 93 min in which no vital signs were documented in the anesthesia record. Relying on the physiological monitors to assess the patient's condition, the anesthesiologist did not recognize the interruption of data transmission, because the “active” medication window obscured the graphical display of the vital sign window. IMPLICATIONS: We report an unrecognized data transmission loss while using an automated anesthesia record keeping system. A documentation window concealed the home screen window, which displayed graphical vital sign data. Absence of vital signs on the printed anesthesia record, and a bad surgical outcome, increased our medical liability exposure.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
2022 · 19.569 Zit.
MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database
2016 · 8.029 Zit.
Clarifying Confusion: The Confusion Assessment Method
1990 · 5.253 Zit.
The impact of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database
2001 · 4.573 Zit.
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
2000 · 3.740 Zit.