Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?
2008·225 Zitationen·Journal of the Royal Society of MedicineOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen225
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2008
Jahr
Abstract
Editors should not assume that reviewers will detect most major errors, particularly those concerned with the context of study. Short training packages have only a slight impact on improving error detection.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note
1997 · 14.654 Zit.
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
2011 · 13.960 Zit.
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2011 · 13.721 Zit.
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions
1981 · 11.513 Zit.
Evidence-Based Medicine
1992 · 4.161 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
Themen
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsRadiology practices and education