Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Follow-up and final results of the oslo I study comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading
54
Zitationen
11
Autoren
2005
Jahr
Abstract
There is no statistically significant difference in cancer detection rate between SFM and FFDM with soft-copy reading in a mammography screening program. Analysis of cancers missed at FFDM with soft-copy reading indicates that close attention has to be paid to systematic use of image display protocols.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
2013 · 4.538 Zit.
Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer
2007 · 2.444 Zit.
Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis
2006 · 2.153 Zit.
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
2016 · 2.117 Zit.
Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening
2005 · 1.935 Zit.