Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The PEN-Ivory Project: Exploring User-interface Design for the Selection of Items from Large Controlled Vocabularies of Medicine
62
Zitationen
3
Autoren
1996
Jahr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore different user-interface designs for structured progress note entry, with a long-term goal of developing design guidelines for user interfaces where users select items from large medical vocabularies. DESIGN: The authors created eight different prototypes of a pen-based progress-note-writing system called PEN-Ivory. Each prototype allows physicians to write patient progress notes using simple pen-based gestures such as circle, line-out, and scratch-out. The result of an interaction with PEN-Ivory is a progress note in English prose. The eight prototypes were designed in a principled way, so that they differ from one another in just one of three different user-interface characteristics. MEASUREMENTS: Five of the eight prototypes were tested by measuring the time it took 15 users, each using a distinct prototype, to document three patient cases consisting of a total of 63 medical findings. RESULTS: The prototype that allowed the fastest data entry had the following three user-interface characteristics: it used a paging rather than a scrolling form, it used a fixed palette of modifiers rather than a dynamic "pop-up" palette, and it made available all findings from the controlled vocabulary at once rather than displaying only a subset of findings generated by analyzing the patient's problem list. CONCLUSION: Even simple design changes to a user interface can make dramatic differences in user performance. The authors discuss possible influences on performance, such as positional constancy, user uncertainty and system anticipation, that may contribute significantly to the effectiveness of systems that display menus of items from large controlled vocabularies of medicine.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations
2006 · 6.256 Zit.
Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)
2004 · 6.244 Zit.
Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models
2012 · 5.937 Zit.
Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review
2011 · 5.307 Zit.
Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century
2000 · 5.015 Zit.