Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
10.857
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2004
Jahr
Abstract
The purposes of this article are to position mixed methods research ( mixed research is a synonym) as the natural complement to traditional qualitative and quantitative research, to present pragmatism as offering an attractive philosophical partner for mixed methods research, and to provide a framework for designing and conducting mixed methods research. In doing this, we briefly review the paradigm “wars” and incompatibility thesis, we show some commonalities between quantitative and qualitative research, we explain the tenets of pragmatism, we explain the fundamental principle of mixed research and how to apply it, we provide specific sets of designs for the two major types of mixed methods research ( mixed-model designs and mixed-method designs), and, finally, we explain mixed methods research as following (recursively) an eight-step process. A key feature of mixed methods research is its methodological pluralism or eclecticism, which frequently results in superior research (compared to monomethod research). Mixed methods research will be successful as more investigators study and help advance its concepts and as they regularly practice it.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
2007 · 39.280 Zit.
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
2019 · 15.272 Zit.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
2008 · 15.142 Zit.
Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science
2009 · 14.316 Zit.
Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
2010 · 13.957 Zit.