Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Image Processing Algorithms for Digital Mammography: A Pictorial Essay
164
Zitationen
14
Autoren
2000
Jahr
Abstract
Digital mammography systems allow manipulation of fine differences in image contrast by means of image processing algorithms. Different display algorithms have advantages and disadvantages for the specific tasks required in breast imaging-diagnosis and screening. Manual intensity windowing can produce digital mammograms very similar to standard screen-film mammograms but is limited by its operator dependence. Histogram-based intensity windowing improves the conspicuity of the lesion edge, but there is loss of detail outside the dense parts of the image. Mixture-model intensity windowing enhances the visibility of lesion borders against the fatty background, but the mixed parenchymal densities abutting the lesion may be lost. Contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization can also provide subtle edge information but might degrade performance in the screening setting by enhancing the visibility of nuisance information. Unsharp masking enhances the sharpness of the borders of mass lesions, but this algorithm may make even an indistinct mass appear more circumscribed. Peripheral equalization displays lesion details well and preserves the peripheral information in the surrounding breast, but there may be flattening of image contrast in the nonperipheral portions of the image. Trex processing allows visualization of both lesion detail and breast edge information but reduces image contrast.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.989 Zit.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
2011 · 13.794 Zit.
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.516 Zit.
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
2019 · 12.125 Zit.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
2017 · 8.422 Zit.