Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Blinded Comparison of Computer-Aided Detection with Human Second Reading in Screening Mammography
53
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2007
Jahr
Abstract
A human second reader or the use of a CAD system can increase the cancer detection rate, but we found no statistical difference between the two because of the small sample size. A possible benefit from a human second reader is that CAD systems can only point to possible abnormalities, whereas a human must determine the significance of the finding. Having two humans review a study may increase detection rates due to interpreter--hence, perceptual--variability and not just increased detection.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.845 Zit.
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.415 Zit.
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
2019 · 11.999 Zit.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
2017 · 8.346 Zit.
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
2015 · 8.111 Zit.