Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve?
5.140
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2002
Jahr
Abstract
We argue that an understanding of the faculty of language requires substantial interdisciplinary cooperation. We suggest how current developments in linguistics can be profitably wedded to work in evolutionary biology, anthropology, psychology, and neuroscience. We submit that a distinction should be made between the faculty of language in the broad sense (FLB) and in the narrow sense (FLN). FLB includes a sensory-motor system, a conceptual-intentional system, and the computational mechanisms for recursion, providing the capacity to generate an infinite range of expressions from a finite set of elements. We hypothesize that FLN only includes recursion and is the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language. We further argue that FLN may have evolved for reasons other than language, hence comparative studies might look for evidence of such computations outside of the domain of communication (for example, number, navigation, and social relations).
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
2017 · 18.340 Zit.
Finding Structure in Time
1990 · 10.637 Zit.
A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change in Informational Cascades.
— · 6.553 Zit.
A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge.
1997 · 6.067 Zit.
Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants
1996 · 5.624 Zit.