Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Perceptions and predictors of questionable research practices in the social sciences
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2016
Jahr
Abstract
Conclusions ■ As expected, moral judgment, anticipated shame, and perceptions of harm were the strongest and most consistent predictors of the perceived likelihood of misconduct. ■ Perceived likelihood of detection only predicted for one scenario, and sanctions had no overall effect (sanctions did affect how strongly moral judgment affected likelihoods). ■ There were no differences in perceived likelihood of misconduct by type of university. ■ Early career faculty reported higher likelihoods. ■ Organizational justice was not related to likelihoods.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.511 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.315 Zit.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
2009 · 1.924 Zit.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
2023 · 1.840 Zit.