OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 12.04.2026, 07:19

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Perceptions and predictors of questionable research practices in the social sciences

2016·0 Zitationen·UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa)Open Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

0

Zitationen

2

Autoren

2016

Jahr

Abstract

Conclusions ■ As expected, moral judgment, anticipated shame, and perceptions of harm were the strongest and most consistent predictors of the perceived likelihood of misconduct. ■ Perceived likelihood of detection only predicted for one scenario, and sanctions had no overall effect (sanctions did affect how strongly moral judgment affected likelihoods). ■ There were no differences in perceived likelihood of misconduct by type of university. ■ Early career faculty reported higher likelihoods. ■ Organizational justice was not related to likelihoods.

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Themen

Academic integrity and plagiarismscientometrics and bibliometrics researchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen