Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Evaluating the Quality and Usability of Open Data for Public Health Research: A Systematic Review of Data Offerings on 3 Open Data Platforms
54
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2016
Jahr
Abstract
CONTEXT: Government datasets are newly available on open data platforms that are publicly accessible, available in nonproprietary formats, free of charge, and with unlimited use and distribution rights. They provide opportunities for health research, but their quality and usability are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe available open health data, identify whether data are presented in a way that is aligned with best practices and usable for researchers, and examine differences across platforms. DESIGN: Two reviewers systematically reviewed a random sample of data offerings on NYC OpenData (New York City, all offerings, n = 37), Health Data NY (New York State, 25% sample, n = 71), and HealthData.gov (US Department of Health and Human Services, 5% sample, n = 75), using a standard coding guide. SETTING: Three open health data platforms at the federal, New York State, and New York City levels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data characteristics from the coding guide were aggregated into summary indices for intrinsic data quality, contextual data quality, adherence to the Dublin Core metadata standards, and the 5-star open data deployment scheme. RESULTS: One quarter of the offerings were structured datasets; other presentation styles included charts (14.7%), documents describing data (12.0%), maps (10.9%), and query tools (7.7%). Health Data NY had higher intrinsic data quality (P < .001), contextual data quality (P < .001), and Dublin Core metadata standards adherence (P < .001). All met basic "web availability" open data standards; fewer met higher standards of "hyperlinked to other data." CONCLUSIONS: Although all platforms need improvement, they already provide readily available data for health research. Sustained effort on improving open data websites and metadata is necessary for ensuring researchers use these data, thereby increasing their research value.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners
2019 · 23.454 Zit.
Welcome to the Tidyverse
2019 · 21.025 Zit.
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
2016 · 17.351 Zit.
Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows
2017 · 4.157 Zit.
Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released
2013 · 4.041 Zit.