Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Comparison of Treating Tibial Nonunion with Bone and Soft Tissue Defect: Ilizarov Only Versus Free Flap and Ilizarov
2
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2002
Jahr
Abstract
Purpose : To statistically analyze the advantages of distraction osteogenesis in combination with free flap in the treatment of tibial open fracture with bone and soft tissue defect. Materials and Methods : Twenty patients with tibial open fracture with bone and soft tissue defect were treated by distraction osteogenesis with or without flap. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months and retrospectively analyzed, for the admission period, the out patient follow-up period, and the intravenous antibiotic period, and distraction consolidation indices were determined. Results : Those treated with free flap showed statistically significance shorter antibiotic period, admission period, and distraction consolidation indices. Conclusion : Free flap and distraction osteogenesis with an Ilizarov external fixator has many advantages for treating tibial open fracture with bone and soft tissue defect.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures
2006 · 4.606 Zit.
ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand
2004 · 4.423 Zit.
Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures
1996 · 3.689 Zit.
Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions.
2003 · 3.529 Zit.
Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones
1976 · 3.242 Zit.