Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
In reply: Cognitive bias and diagnostic error (November 2015)
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2016
Jahr
Abstract
IN REPLY : We thank Dr. Field for his insights and personal observations related to diagnosis and biases that contribute to diagnostic errors. Dr. Field’s comment about the importance of revisiting one’s initial working diagnosis is consistent with our proposed diagnostic time out. A diagnostic
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note
1997 · 14.688 Zit.
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
2011 · 14.027 Zit.
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2011 · 13.776 Zit.
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions
1981 · 11.535 Zit.
Clarifying Confusion: The Confusion Assessment Method
1990 · 5.248 Zit.