Scientific Misconduct Hurts

Abstract

Letters6 June 2017Scientific Misconduct HurtsChristine Laine, MD, MPHChristine Laine, MD, MPHSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/L17-0148 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail IN RESPONSE:Mr. Henderson questions whether Annals did not publish Dansinger and colleagues' manuscript when we had the opportunity to review it in 2015 because of Finelli's review, the editors were “bamboozled by the currently popular opinion [about] high-density lipoprotein cholesterol,” or it was “unfashionable.” Many issues factor into Annals' editorial decision, but those that Mr. Henderson raises did not. The manuscript reported a secondary analysis of a trial that had already been published, and we judged the amount of new information it provided to be limited relative to other papers under consideration. Thus, issues of priority weighed heavily in ...Reference1. Dansinger M. Dear plagiarist: a letter to a peer reviewer who stole and published our manuscript as his own. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:143. [PMID: 27951597]. doi:10.7326/M16-2551 LinkGoogle Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M16-2550. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoScientific Misconduct Hurts Christine Laine Scientific Misconduct Hurts George Henderson Metrics Cited byAddressing Reproducibility: Peer Review, Impact Factors, Checklists, Guidelines, and Reproducibility Initiatives 6 June 2017Volume 166, Issue 11Page: 856KeywordsBehaviorDisclosureHigh density lipoprotein cholesterolScientific misconduct ePublished: 6 June 2017 Issue Published: 6 June 2017 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2017 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Ähnliche Arbeiten