Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Imaging With Synthesized 2D Mammography: Differences, Advantages, and Pitfalls Compared With Digital Mammography
61
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2017
Jahr
Abstract
Despite subjective differences in the appearance of s2D and digital mammograms, early outcomes of screening using s2D mammography and DBT are not inferior to those achieved with digital mammography and DBT. Understanding these variations may aid in implementing this technique and improving patient outcomes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
2013 · 4.553 Zit.
Mammographic Density and the Risk and Detection of Breast Cancer
2007 · 2.449 Zit.
Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis
2006 · 2.156 Zit.
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
2016 · 2.117 Zit.
Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians
2013 · 1.990 Zit.