Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth
196
Zitationen
11
Autoren
2017
Jahr
Abstract
- Awareness of the gold standard paradox is necessary when using traditional pathologist scores to analytically validate a tIA tool because image analysis is used specifically to overcome known sources of bias in visual assessment of tissue sections.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.959 Zit.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
2011 · 13.781 Zit.
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.499 Zit.
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
2019 · 12.096 Zit.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
2017 · 8.413 Zit.