Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Diagnosing adaptive comanagement across multiple cases
26
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2017
Jahr
Abstract
Adaptive comanagement is at an important cross-road: different research paths forward are possible, and a diagnostic approach has been identified as a promising one. Accordingly, we operationalize a diagnostic approach, using a framework, to set a new direction for adaptive comanagement research. We set out three main first-tier variables: antecedents, process, and outcomes, and these main variables are situated within a fourth: the setting. Within each of these variables, significant depth of study may be achieved by investigating second-and third-tier variables. Causal relationships among variables, and particularly related to the outcomes of adaptive comanagement, may also be investigated at varying depths using the diagnostic framework and associated nomenclature. We believe that the diagnostic approach we describe offers a unifying methodological approach to advancing adaptive comanagement research as well as similar approaches. There are significant benefits to be gained, including building a database of case studies using this common framework, advancing theory, and ultimately, improving social and ecological outcomes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation
1987 · 49.538 Zit.
APACHE II
1985 · 13.612 Zit.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2003 · 11.318 Zit.
The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.
1974 · 8.023 Zit.
Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults
2007 · 6.225 Zit.