Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Improving the human–robot interface for telemanipulated robotic long bone fracture reduction: Joystick device vs. haptic manipulator
11
Zitationen
8
Autoren
2017
Jahr
Abstract
The Joystick and the Phantom devices resulted in similarly accurate reductions, with the Joystick having an easier learning curve. The Phantom device offered no advantage over the Joystick for fracture telemanipulation. Considering the high cost of the Phantom device and the lack of a demonstrable advantage over the Joystick, its use is not justified for implementation in a fracture telemanipulation workflow. The Joystick remains as a low-cost and effective device for developing 3D fracture telemanipulation techniques.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures
2006 · 4.603 Zit.
ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand
2004 · 4.415 Zit.
Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures
1996 · 3.688 Zit.
Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions.
2003 · 3.529 Zit.
Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones
1976 · 3.242 Zit.