Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Machine Learning with Applications in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis
301
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2018
Jahr
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers among women worldwide, representing the majority of new cancer cases and cancer-related deaths according to global statistics, making it a significant public health problem in today’s society. The early diagnosis of BC can improve the prognosis and chance of survival significantly, as it can promote timely clinical treatment to patients. Further accurate classification of benign tumours can prevent patients undergoing unnecessary treatments. Thus, the correct diagnosis of BC and classification of patients into malignant or benign groups is the subject of much research. Because of its unique advantages in critical features detection from complex BC datasets, machine learning (ML) is widely recognised as the methodology of choice in BC pattern classification and forecast modelling. In this paper, we aim to review ML techniques and their applications in BC diagnosis and prognosis. Firstly, we provide an overview of ML techniques including artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector machines (SVMs), decision trees (DTs), and k-nearest neighbors (k-NNs). Then, we investigate their applications in BC. Our primary data is drawn from the Wisconsin breast cancer database (WBCD) which is the benchmark database for comparing the results through different algorithms. Finally, a healthcare system model of our recent work is also shown.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.880 Zit.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
2011 · 13.750 Zit.
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.439 Zit.
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
2019 · 12.033 Zit.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
2017 · 8.379 Zit.