Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype
326
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2018
Jahr
Abstract
RNA-based, multi-gene molecular assays are available and widely used for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers. However, RNA-based genomic tests can be costly and are not available in many countries. Methods for inferring molecular subtype from histologic images may identify patients most likely to benefit from further genomic testing. To identify patients who could benefit from molecular testing based on H&E stained histologic images, we developed an image analysis approach using deep learning. A training set of 571 breast tumors was used to create image-based classifiers for tumor grade, ER status, PAM50 intrinsic subtype, histologic subtype, and risk of recurrence score (ROR-PT). The resulting classifiers were applied to an independent test set (<i>n</i> = 288), and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each was assessed on the test set. Histologic image analysis with deep learning distinguished low-intermediate vs. high tumor grade (82% accuracy), ER status (84% accuracy), Basal-like vs. non-Basal-like (77% accuracy), Ductal vs. Lobular (94% accuracy), and high vs. low-medium ROR-PT score (75% accuracy). Sampling considerations in the training set minimized bias in the test set. Incorrect classification of ER status was significantly more common for Luminal B tumors. These data provide proof of principle that molecular marker status, including a critical clinical biomarker (i.e., ER status), can be predicted with accuracy >75% based on H&E features. Image-based methods could be promising for identifying patients with a greater need for further genomic testing, or in place of classically scored variables typically accomplished using human-based scoring.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.880 Zit.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
2011 · 13.750 Zit.
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
2017 · 13.439 Zit.
A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
2019 · 12.033 Zit.
QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis
2017 · 8.379 Zit.