Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Community Partnership in Precision Medicine: Themes from a Community Engagement Conference
13
Zitationen
15
Autoren
2018
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Patient and community engagement in under-resourced communities is a key issue for precision medicine research. We report proceedings from a community-academic partnered conference in Los Angeles to promote community understanding of precision medicine and generate engagement recommendations. Methods: Planning group review of planning, presentations, and audience discussions from facilitator notes and participant survey data from a one-day conference. Findings: Community-academic planning broadened community participation and presentations. More than 80% of survey participants indicated they would participate in the national precision medicine initiative, and most were willing to share diverse sources of data. Discussions identified trust concerns related to historical research abuses, data privacy, potential effects of findings on health care, personal safety, research procedures, the time-frame for benefit, and confusion about different initiatives. Concerns were balanced by belief in science to improve health. Recommendations included a community partnered participatory approach with support for local community and academic teams to engage stakeholders with written/online resources and partnered workgroups addressing key concerns. Conclusion: Conference participants expressed high willingness to participate in precision medicine studies, but discussions highlighted trust and transparency issues and suggested community partnered research with local capacity building.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.822 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 7.011 Zit.
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
1995 · 5.586 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.433 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.806 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Healthy African American Families II(US)
- Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science(US)
- UCLA Medical Center(US)
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute(US)
- Harbor–UCLA Medical Center(US)
- The Lundquist Institute(US)
- Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute(US)
- UCLA Health(US)
- John F. Kennedy University(US)
- University of California, Los Angeles(US)
- RAND Corporation(US)
- Digital Research Alliance of Canada
- Orange County Asian Pacific Islander Community Alliance(US)