Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Peer Review: How much weightage should the editor give to reviewer’s opinion?
3
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2018
Jahr
Abstract
doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.345.16322 How to cite this:Jawaid SA, Jawaid M. Peer Review: How much weightage should the editor give to reviewer’s opinion? Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(5):1051-1053. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.345.16322 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.817 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.514 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.745 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.103 Zit.