Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer
490
Zitationen
19
Autoren
2019
Jahr
Abstract
For prostate cancer patients, the Gleason score is one of the most important prognostic factors, potentially determining treatment independent of the stage. However, Gleason scoring is based on subjective microscopic examination of tumor morphology and suffers from poor reproducibility. Here we present a deep learning system (DLS) for Gleason scoring whole-slide images of prostatectomies. Our system was developed using 112 million pathologist-annotated image patches from 1226 slides, and evaluated on an independent validation dataset of 331 slides. Compared to a reference standard provided by genitourinary pathology experts, the mean accuracy among 29 general pathologists was 0.61 on the validation set. The DLS achieved a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy of 0.70 (<i>p</i> = 0.002) and trended towards better patient risk stratification in correlations to clinical follow-up data. Our approach could improve the accuracy of Gleason scoring and subsequent therapy decisions, particularly where specialist expertise is unavailable. The DLS also goes beyond the current Gleason system to more finely characterize and quantitate tumor morphology, providing opportunities for refinement of the Gleason system itself.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Docetaxel plus Prednisone or Mitoxantrone plus Prednisone for Advanced Prostate Cancer
2004 · 5.707 Zit.
Decision Curve Analysis: A Novel Method for Evaluating Prediction Models
2006 · 5.196 Zit.
Increased Survival with Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer after Chemotherapy
2012 · 4.551 Zit.
Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
1998 · 4.498 Zit.
Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European Study
2009 · 3.997 Zit.