Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Plagiarism in English Academic Writing: Students’ Perceptions
6
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2018
Jahr
Abstract
This study aimed at investigating students" views on plagiarism in English academic writing and the factors that lead them to plagiarize.A descriptive quantitative method was used to describe and explain the phenomenon of student plagiarism.A questionnaire was used as an instrument to obtain some data.The data was collected from three classes of semester six university students at Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN or Islamic National University) Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh.The result of the first analysis demonstrated that students perceive some types of plagiarism as more serious than others, ranging from using another author"s whole document, another author"s sentences/paragraphs, another author"s phrases or another author"s ideas.Furthermore, students said acts of plagiarism included: 1) copying statements (from books, websites and/or electronic journals without using inverted comas to show they are quotes, 2) combining and changing various statements from published works of others, 3) buying assignments from senior students/others, 4) using the work of others and using research findings from electronic journals without attribution, and 5) copying all or part of another person"s assignment without proper citations and references.Acts they saw as not plagiarism included copying statements from books, websites and electronic journals using inverted commas, translating sentences from the internet in another language and then constructing one"s own sentences while acknowledging original authors that were the source of ideas.The secondary results showed that students perceived the five major factors of why plagiarism was committed were (i) efficiency gains, (ii) lack of
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.521 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.321 Zit.
Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis
2006 · 2.217 Zit.
How Does ChatGPT Perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? The Implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment
2023 · 1.985 Zit.