Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Legal perspectives on black box recording devices in the operating environment
63
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2019
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A video and medical data recorder in the operating theatre is possible, but concerns over privacy, data use and litigation have limited widespread implementation. The literature on legal considerations and challenges to overcome, and guidelines related to use of data recording in the surgical environment, are presented in this narrative review. METHODS: A review of PubMed and Embase databases and Cochrane Library was undertaken. International jurisprudence on the topic was searched. Practice recommendations and legal perspectives were acquired based on experience with implementation and use of a video and medical data recorder in the operating theatre. RESULTS: After removing duplicates, 116 citations were retrieved and abstracts screened; 31 articles were assessed for eligibility and 20 papers were finally included. According to the European General Data Protection Regulation and US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, researchers are required to make sure that personal data collected from patients and healthcare professionals are used fairly and lawfully, for limited and specifically stated purposes, in an adequate and relevant manner, kept safe and secure, and stored for no longer than is absolutely necessary. Data collected for the sole purpose of healthcare quality improvement are not required to be added to the patient's medical record. CONCLUSION: Transparency on the use and purpose of recorded data should be ensured to both staff and patients. The recorded video data do not need to be used as evidence in court if patient medical records are well maintained. Clear legislation on data responsibility is needed to use the medical recorder optimally for quality improvement initiatives.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The SCARE 2018 statement: Updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines
2018 · 2.335 Zit.
The Levels of Evidence and Their Role in Evidence-Based Medicine
2011 · 2.121 Zit.
CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document
2017 · 2.033 Zit.
The SCARE Statement: Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines
2016 · 1.681 Zit.
Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: Results of a consensus meeting via the Internet
2003 · 1.201 Zit.