Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Can Artificial Intelligence Reliably Report Chest X-Rays?: Radiologist\n Validation of an Algorithm trained on 2.3 Million X-Rays
32
Zitationen
12
Autoren
2018
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Chest X-rays are the most commonly performed, cost-effective\ndiagnostic imaging tests ordered by physicians. A clinically validated AI\nsystem that can reliably separate normals from abnormals can be invaluble\nparticularly in low-resource settings. The aim of this study was to develop and\nvalidate a deep learning system to detect various abnormalities seen on a chest\nX-ray. Methods: A deep learning system was trained on 2.3 million chest X-rays\nand their corresponding radiology reports to identify various abnormalities\nseen on a Chest X-ray. The system was tested against - 1. A three-radiologist\nmajority on an independent, retrospectively collected set of 2000\nX-rays(CQ2000) 2. Radiologist reports on a separate validation set of 100,000\nscans(CQ100k). The primary accuracy measure was area under the ROC curve (AUC),\nestimated separately for each abnormality and for normal versus abnormal scans.\nResults: On the CQ2000 dataset, the deep learning system demonstrated an AUC of\n0.92(CI 0.91-0.94) for detection of abnormal scans, and AUC(CI) of\n0.96(0.94-0.98), 0.96(0.94-0.98), 0.95(0.87-1), 0.95(0.92-0.98),\n0.93(0.90-0.96), 0.89(0.83-0.94), 0.91(0.87-0.96), 0.94(0.93-0.96),\n0.98(0.97-1) for the detection of blunted costophrenic angle, cardiomegaly,\ncavity, consolidation, fibrosis, hilar enlargement, nodule, opacity and pleural\neffusion. The AUCs were similar on the larger CQ100k dataset except for\ndetecting normals where the AUC was 0.86(0.85-0.86). Interpretation: Our study\ndemonstrates that a deep learning algorithm trained on a large, well-labelled\ndataset can accurately detect multiple abnormalities on chest X-rays. As these\nsystems improve in accuracy, applying deep learning to widen the reach of chest\nX-ray interpretation and improve reporting efficiency will add tremendous value\nin radiology workflows and public health screenings globally.\n
Ähnliche Arbeiten
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
2008 · 28.906 Zit.
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours
1987 · 16.123 Zit.
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
2017 · 13.591 Zit.
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
2011 · 10.770 Zit.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM
2010 · 9.110 Zit.