Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Accurate, reliable and fast robustness evaluation
50
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2019
Jahr
Abstract
Throughout the past five years, the susceptibility of neural networks to minimal adversarial perturbations has moved from a peculiar phenomenon to a core issue in Deep Learning. Despite much attention, however, progress towards more robust models is significantly impaired by the difficulty of evaluating the robustness of neural network models. Today's methods are either fast but brittle (gradient-based attacks), or they are fairly reliable but slow (score- and decision-based attacks). We here develop a new set of gradient-based adversarial attacks which (a) are more reliable in the face of gradient-masking than other gradient-based attacks, (b) perform better and are more query efficient than current state-of-the-art gradient-based attacks, (c) can be flexibly adapted to a wide range of adversarial criteria and (d) require virtually no hyperparameter tuning. These findings are carefully validated across a diverse set of six different models and hold for L2 and L-infinity in both targeted as well as untargeted scenarios. Implementations will be available in all major toolboxes (Foolbox, CleverHans and ART). We hope that this class of attacks will make robustness evaluations easier and more reliable, thus contributing to more signal in the search for more robust machine learning models.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
2016 · 30.326 Zit.
MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks
2018 · 24.398 Zit.
An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale
2020 · 21.297 Zit.
CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module
2018 · 21.274 Zit.
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
2015 · 18.491 Zit.